Internet2 Sessions

08:45 AM
10:30 AM
01:15 PM

Monday General Session: Global Innovation

Sponsored by Juniper Networks
Netcast sponsored by 2014 GS – Cisco

ROOM: Plaza Ballroom A/B/CSPEAKERS: Patrick BurnsAnthony Frank

01:15 PM- 02:30 PM

Keynote Speaker: Chris Vein

Chris Vein leads the implementation of the World Bank’s ICT strategy, ICT policy and engagement dialogue with internal and external clients, and global ICT knowledge and expertise sharing with client countries. Prior to joining the World Bank, Vein was the Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer for Government Innovation in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, where he focused on making government more open, entrepreneurial, and lean; creating new and innovative opportunities for delivering government products, services and processes; and incubating innovation capacity in the civic, technology and civic society arenas.

Over the past two decades, Chris Vein has had the honor of serving four U.S. Presidents, thousands of professional association practitioners around the world, for-profit consulting organizations, and local government organizations. Learn more about the World Bank’s Chris Vein at

Photo courtesy of the World Bank.

03:00 PM
04:30 PM
08:45 AM
10:30 AM

Tuesday General Session: Future of the University

Sponsored by 2014 GS – Microsoft
Netcast sponsored by 2014 GS – Cisco

ROOM: Plaza Ballroom A/B/CSPEAKERS: H. David LambertPhilip DiStefanoMichael McRobbieLarry Levine

10:30 AM- 11:45 AM

Keynote Speaker: Shirley Ann Jackson

The Honorable Shirley Ann Jackson, Ph.D., is the 18th president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute of Troy, New York, and Hartford, Connecticut, the oldest technological research university in the United States. With a focus on Rensselaer as a top-tier technological research university with global reach and global impact, her tenure has been marked by a successful $1.4 billion capital campaign, the hiring of over 300 new faculty, a tripling of research awards and a tripling of applications to the freshman class, the construction of state-of-the art research platforms, and innovations both in the curriculum and student life. Dr. Jackson is a director of several major corporations, including FedEx and IBM. She serves on the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), the White House Advanced Manufacturing Partnership Steering Committee 2.0, the U.S. Secretary of State’s International Security Advisory Board, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Secretary of Energy Advisory Board.

01:15 PM
03:00 PM
04:30 PM
08:45 AM
10:30 AM
10:30 AM- 11:45 AM

Keynote Speaker: Larry Peterson

01:15 PM
03:00 PM
04:30 PM
08:45 AM
10:30 AM

My Response to Milt’s Tweet

Milt Capps ‏@miltcapps Venture validation? #Nashville #startups & Tech talent so good they get bought and move elsewhere – natural, but not what we’re hoping for.

My response:

My major fear for a gigified Nashville (ATT, Google, Comcast, NES, whomever) is that managers|C-suites will not learn that geography doesn’t always have to matter. I feel|think that the telephonification of rural America could provide an apt parable. If we bring communication to the farm, that does not equate with the adoption of the technology. If farmer Brown insists on continuing to drive into the General Store to get his real time information then much of the value of the telephone is lost.

The European Enlightenment is another good case study. Tho @jhagel and @sgblank have caused me to more greatly appreciate the value of technology clusters (Silicon Valley) and while Michael Faraday needed the facilities of the Royal Society, today’s cloud|software products|services and tech talent often do not need a similar laboratory* (they, of course, often share a similar need for patrons). The Enlightenment spread, in part, by use of the printing press. While the coffee house effect was very important, publication allowed for non-face-to-face communication on a mass scale, for those willing to avail themselves of the opportunity. Here lies my point: just because one European city did not adapt to new technologies quickly, that didn’t mean that others (their “competition”) did not.

Now that we have the entréstructure, and the hope of gigification, it is time for us to put a laser light upon the education|modification of the Nashville legacy management culture’s reticence to adopt tech to its fullest or we are lost; lost, I say! (OK, it will continue to produce sub-optimal results).

*I find the trend of Library|MakerSpaces very intriguing

GÉANT Open Calls

GÉANT Open Call: Authentication – WoT4LoA

GÉANT Open Call: Authentication – SENSE

GÉANT Open Call: Applications and Tools – ARES

GÉANT Open Call: Applications and Tools – NSI-CONTEST

GÉANT Open Call: Authentication – MEAL

GÉANT Open Call: Authentication – CLASSe

GÉANT Open Call: Applications and Tools – eMusic

This Day in Health Science

On the one hand Decline in Research and Development :: Drug Safety Executive Blog

Dawn Van Dam
General Manager
Cambridge Healthtech Associates™
T: 781-707-8289

and on the other:

The Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics (CIRGE) presents our next Journal Club of the
2013-2014 Academic Year
Ethical Developments in the FDA’s Halt of 23andMe,Inc.
Dr. Marsha Michie PhD, CIRGE Post-Doctoral Fellow
When: Wednesday, January 29th from 1pm – 2pm *NOTE SPECIAL TIME*
Where: SCBE Conference Room
(Directions HERE)

Additionally, this discussion will be led by CIRGE Co-PI and Stanford Law School Professor Hank Greely and SCBE Senior Research Scholar Sandra Lee!

There are three readings assigned for this journal club, and they can be found here!

PLEASE LIKE The Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics and the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics on Facebook!

For more information on Journal Clubs and to access the readings for this and all Journal Clubs, please visit:

Please join us, and forward widely!

Colleen M. Berryessa
Program Manager, Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics (CIRGE)
Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics
1215A Welch Road, Room 71
Stanford, CA 94305-5417
W: (650) 736-0954
F: (650) 723-6131

Meanwhile, over at caGrid and the National Cancer Informatics Program.

Pew Elon University Survey about the future of the internet

Welcome to the Pew Internet 2013-2014 Future of the Internet Survey

In this survey, Pew Internet and Elon University pose eight questions asking you to share your best assessment of where you expect we will be in 2025 and how you envision the future impact of the Internet. We are not advocating for any future outcomes nor do we necessarily believe some of these scenarios will come to pass. These questions are designed to provoke and launch informed conversations.

Please say whether you believe the answer to each question is “yes” or “no” by selecting the answer that best indicates what you believe will come to pass. This may not be the future you would prefer – but please select the future you expect is most likely. You will then be asked to elaborate on your answers, sharing your thoughts, pro and con, on the future you expect to evolve.

Below is some important information about taking the survey…

This survey is completely confidential unless you indicate you would like your responses attributed to you. You can indicate this by putting your name in the text box at the beginning of a response. Otherwise, results are reported in the aggregate, and responses are not attributed to particular individuals.

If you prefer not to answer a question, you can simply skip it and move on to the next question.

Many questions are followed by text boxes in which you are asked to type your response. These text boxes have no character limit, so feel free to expand on your thoughts as much as you wish.

Please move through the survey using the “back” and “next” buttons just below the question box. Do not use your browser’s back button.

Your responses are saved as you move through the survey, but they are not final until you click the “submit” button at the end of the survey. Once you submit your survey, you will not be able to log back in.

If you need to, you can suspend your session by clicking the “logout” link below the question box. Your answers will be saved, and you can log back in later to finish the survey.

Security, liberty, privacy online – Will policy makers and technology innovators create a secure, popularly accepted, and trusted privacy-rights infrastructure by 2025 that allows for business innovation and monetization while also offering individuals choices for protecting their personal information in easy-to-use formats?

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe what you think the reality will be in 2025 when it comes to the overall public perception about whether policy makers and corporations have struck the right balance between personal privacy, secure data, and compelling content and apps that emerge from consumer tracking and analytics.

As of now, the only technology tools which can be used are cryptocurrencies, encryption, vpns, sneaker nets, and software-defined networking. Layers of legal liability could be built atop these approaches but with global corporations and central banks increasingly willing to act illegally, these may be untenable.

Bonus question: Consider the future of privacy in a broader social context. How will public norms about privacy be different in 2025 from the way they are now?

C-Suites will either become far more or far less accountable. Ditto politicians. Citizens will reunionize (associations, guilds, political parties) . The DATA Act and similar politco-technical data transparency approaches will either be demanded or the internet will be more militarized. Private encrypted mesh networks may become more pervasive.

The economic impact of robotic advances and AI – Self-driving cars, intelligent digital agents that can act for you, and robots are advancing rapidly. Will networked, automated, artificial intelligence (AI) applications and robotic devices have displaced more jobs than they have created by 2025?

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe your expectation about the degree to which robots, digital agents, and AI tools will have disrupted white collar and blue collar jobs by 2025 and the social consequences that will emerge from that.

This will depend a great deal on how consistently standards are adopted as “sources of truth” eg ontologies, formal taxonomies, semantics in general. There is currently a lot of emphasis placed on math deficits of students but the ability to work in formal and informal logic and the ability to perform analysis is the bigger hurdle.

Bonus question: To what degree will AI and robotics be parts of the ordinary landscape of the general population by 2025? Describe which parts of life will change the most as these tools advance and which parts of life will remain relatively unchanged.

Home appliances, healthcare and automobiles.

New killer apps in the gigabit age – Will there be new, distinctive, and uniquely compelling technology applications that capitalize upon significant increases in bandwidth in the U.S. between now and 2025?

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) If you answered “no,” explain why you think there will be incremental change, or hardly any change at all. If you answered “yes,” describe what the killer apps might be as gigabit connectivity becomes available. Explain what new tools and applications will excite people in the next decade and envision the kinds of personal connectivity and immersive media experiences that will seize the public imagination.

Review Mozilla Ignite

Major cyber attacks – By 2025, will a major cyber attack have caused widespread harm to a nation’s security and capacity to defend itself and its people? (By “widespread harm,” we mean significant loss of life or property losses/damage/theft at the levels of tens of billions of dollars.)

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Explain what vulnerabilities nations have to their sovereignty in the coming decade and whether major economic enterprises can or cannot thwart determined opponents. Or explain why you think the level of threat has been hyped and/or why you believe attacks can be successfully thwarted.


The evolution of embedded and wearable devices and the Internet/Cloud of Things – As billions of devices, artifacts, and accessories are networked, will the Internet of Things have widespread and beneficial effects on the everyday lives of the public by 2025?

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe the evolution of the uses of embedded devices, “wearables” and “scanables” by 2025 – where will commercial and social applications of the Internet of Things most commonly and vividly be felt? What social and political difficulties will accompany the rise of the Internet of Things? If you answered “no” please discuss what you believe the barriers are to the spread of the Internet of Things and the benefits that are claimed for it.

They will be widespread and have both beneficial and deleterious effects.

Bonus question: Consider the ways in which people will most commonly interact with the Internet in 2025 and tell us what you think the fate of wearable connected devices such as Google Glass and the Samsung watch will be. What do you think of the future prospect that people will interact via their thoughts or other bodily signals such as eye movements?

Sensors meshes for the head, voice control and audio output will be more common then now. Biotechnologies utilizing in body sensors for healing, disease management, prosthetics, etc. will become more common. Technologies developed for those with disabilities tend to be the harbingers of those things which become available.

Technology industry success – In 2025, which of the current colossus companies now wielding influence over how we use the Internet will be more important and powerful and which will be less important and less powerful (or even disappear)?

Amazon – More important
Apple – Less important
Facebook – More important
Google – More important
Microsoft – Will stay the same
Other U.S. firms – More important
Non-U.S firms – More important

Please elaborate on your answers above. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe the most powerful Internet-leveraging and Internet-influencing corporations of 2025: Which will they be? What will they do? What kind of impact will they have on human connection, commerce, politics/civic life, education, and health care?

Any firm dealing with databases will grow in importance (IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Saleforce {especially those with cloud-hosted offerings}). They will likely to continue to aggregate outliers like Cache, M, Marklogic. The availability APIs will be the chief indicator of future success for any such technology.

Accessing and sharing content online – By 2025, will there be significant changes for the worse and hindrances to the ways in which people get and share content online compared with the way globally networked people can operate online today?

[X] Yes
[ ] No

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe what you believe are the most serious threats to the most effective accessing and sharing of content on the Internet. What steps are necessary to block changes that would limit people’s optimal future capabilities in using the Internet?

Smart phones will be more powerful, open source software based slates will become more available and sensor nets in general will become more pervasive. This means data, often without context (as opposed to XBRL, etc.) so these will be semantically challenging. Many language groups will become more pervasive so translation will become an even more important offering for niche dialects. At some point the petrol dollar fiat currency system will shift to cpu cycle based currencies. The growth of income disparity will either cause global revolutions or some other form of redress. These larger societal changes will determine who controls the internet.

Bonus question: Describe opportunities that you expect that will help people realize the fullest potential of the Internet. Or describe challenges you expect may stop people from realizing the fullest potential of the Internet.

At some point the petro dollar fiat currency system will shift to cpu cycle based currencies (or some other electricity/energy related {solar is “free money” in that world}). Distributed computing (BOINC, World Community Grid, etc.) go underutilized. Neighborgood clouds a la Glenn Ricart of US-Ignite will follow gigibitification. Results-Only Work Environments will either be adopted and become a cloud computing boon or avoided and an economic anchor which will drag down comuting. Growth of the use HPC in the Cloud, platforms like XSEDE, Internet2 (global NRENs and internconnects like GLORIAD, DANTE, TEIN); collaborative enablement platforms like, impactstory, banyan, git, mercurial, wikis, youtube, vimeo, yammer, google plus, linkedin groups, ning, wordpress, drupal, joomla, dot net nuke (with more Wave features as bandwidth allows). Continued adoption of arious office offerings: google docs, micorosoft sky drive, zimbra, alfresco (IAAS, PAAS, etc.), VOIP, WebRTC. And distributed manufacturing (see San Leandro

Most significant impacts of the Internet – This is an open-ended question allowing you to make your own prediction about the role of the Internet in people’s lives in 2025 and the impact it will have on social, economic and political processes. Good and/or bad, what do you expect to be the most significant overall impacts of our uses of the Internet on humanity between now and 2025?

Keep reading my

Please elaborate on your answer. (Begin with your name if you are willing to have your comments attributed to you.) Describe the greatest impact of the Internet between now and 2025. What will it be and why do you think it will happen?

Keep reading my

These questions are for statistical purposes only…

In which region of the world do you currently live and work?

[X] North America

During what year did you first start using the Internet?

Select year using drop-down menu below.

[X] 1994

What is your primary area of internet interest?
Advocate/Voice of the People/Activist User
Entrepreneur/Business Leader
Research Scientist
Technology Developer/Administrator
[X] Other: Please Specify [Mishmash of the above]

In the box below, please name the organization for which you primarily work and list your job title. If you do not wish to do this, please share a generalized description of your professional position or personal involvement with the Internet. (For example: self-employed digital consultant; CIO for; retired electrical engineer and member of IEEE; director of RLdNet, a non-profit closing the digital divide; legislative assistant in U.S. Congress; Internet law expert for DD Legal.)

PLEASE NOTE: If your elaborations are used in the report we issue about this survey, they will be attributed to you using the information you provide in the box below. For example: Jyn Eilg, CTO of, said, “The future of the Internet…”

If you have chosen to remain anonymous in your written responses to the survey and you are quoted in the report, having a generalized description is still extremely useful. Your comments would be attributed this way: An anonymous survey participant who works as a legislative aide specializing in technology issues in the U.S. Congress said, “The future of the Internet…”

Ed Dodds, Collaboration Strategist, Conmergence

To submit your answers, you must click the “submit survey” button below.

You will then see confirmation that your survey has been successfully submitted.

Thank you for supporting Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project in this important research.

[X] Submit Survey


Economic Benefits of statewide Ultrahighspeed Bandwidth Networks Increasingly Recognized

  • Ohio – OARNet
  • Pennsylvania – KINBER
  • Digitized Financial Transactions Grow

  • ACH Healthcare, Amazon Payments, Cryptocurrencies, MPesa, PayPal
  • Distributed Aggregation Platforms on the Raise

  • Crowdfunding – Indiegogo, Kickstarter
  • Educational – Khan Academy, MOOCs, TED Ed
  • Work – Elance|oDesk
  • Emerging Enabling Technologies

  • Clouds – AWS, HPC, Openstack
  • Data transported with context – DATA Act, SEC
  • Programmable Networks – FirstNet, IPTV, SDN
  • Millennial Blogger

    By Greg Taylor, Managing Editor of

    Alexander Campbell used publishing to advance the restoration of the church. Had he lived today, how would he use media to move the restoration? What can we learn from Campbell’s use of media that can be applied to our use of media today as we advance our own understanding of restoration?

    <ed.note>[Update: originally posted in 2006.] The remainder here… If you haven’t ever appreciated Campbell’s wonderous “The Third Epistle of Peter” I commend it — and assume he might have thought that Greg would have been safe to add a fifth observation in his article — running along the lines of Glyn Moody’s Presentation on the “Opens“</ed.note>

    Africa Centres of Excellence (ACE) Higher Education Project

    I received this via email but lack a supporting url – Ed

    Africa Centers of Excellence Project within Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), Health Sciences and Agricultural Sciences

    Phase I for West and Central Africa (Subject to approval by Executive Directors of World Bank Board of Directors)

    The World Bank in collaboration with West and Central African countries is launching the Africa Centers of Excellence project.

    Project Objective:

    • promote regional specialization among participating universities in areas that address specific common regional development challenges
    • strengthen the capacities of these universities to deliver high quality training and applied research
    • meet the demand for skills required for Africa’s development, such as the extractive industries

    The project will focus on strengthening 7-10 existing institutions in West and Central Africa. Investment of around US$ 8 million in each of the 15 Centers of Excellence (some institutions will qualify for two Centers).

    Institutions will be competitively selected using criteria benchmarked to the best international practice. The qualifying universities would:

    • Strengthen post-graduate programs for a regional student body
    • Offer specialized courses for industry professionals in the region
    • Establish a regional faculty body, improve their faculty and attracting additional top-level faculty
    • Provide learning resources, labs, and minor rehabilitation of existing facilities
    • Establish linkages with companies, government agencies, and research centers for work-place learning, input into curricula, consultancies, and joint research
    • Collaborate with partner institutions to sharing the benefits of the investments, for example through training of faculty, sharing of curricula, and sharing of learning resources.

    Role of private sector:

    • The project will support knowledge partnerships with universities and international research networks
    • Forge knowledge partnerships with the private sector to strengthen curricula and research
    • Support institutions to meet international standards, and generate income through consultancies.

    Project beneficiaries will include:

    • Students in supported institutions and their partner institutions from across Western and Central Africa who will benefit from quality research-based education in high demand areas
    • Companies, governmental or non-governmental organizations that partner with the Africa Centers of Excellence who gain from more interns and graduates with highly relevant training
    • Faculty and staff in the Africa Centers of Excellence who benefit from improved teaching and research conditions.

    Participating countries include Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria Senegal and Togo. Collaboration with regional bodies include (AU, ECOWAS, UEMOA, EAC, AAU and CAMES) with Association of African Universities (AAU) as key regional facilitation partner. Extensive development partnership outreach (AfDB, USAID, AusAID, AFD and other bilateral partners Carnegie Foundation, and several higher education and research networks)